How to mitigate the negative effects of the merger or acquisition of land certificates by leader family on the village that was running social liberalism society

 

Background:

The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies is a complex issue with both potential benefits and risks. Some people believe that these mergers and acquisitions can lead to economic growth, improved food security, and sustainable development. Others believe that they can lead to displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation.

Keyword Thesis:

The support of efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies could mean to limit the social liberalism people. This is because these mergers and acquisitions could lead to the concentration of land ownership in the hands of a few, which could lead to increased inequality and a decrease in social mobility. Additionally, these mergers and acquisitions could lead to the displacement of people from their homes, which could disrupt communities and social networks.

Keywords:

Mergers and acquisitions

Land ownership

Inequality

Social mobility

Displacement

Communities

Social networks

Social liberalism

Thesis:

The support of efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies could mean to limit the social liberalism people. This is because these mergers and acquisitions could lead to the concentration of land ownership in the hands of a few, which could lead to increased inequality and a decrease in social mobility. Additionally, these mergers and acquisitions could lead to the displacement of people from their homes, which could disrupt communities and social networks.

It is important to note that this is just a hypothesis. There is no clear consensus on whether or not the support of efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies will actually limit the social liberalism people. More research is needed to determine the actual impact of these mergers and acquisitions.

 a list of history about merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader that the social liberal society, sorted by years:

Year Event

1950 The United States Supreme Court rules in Wickard v. Filburn that the government can regulate agricultural production even if the production is not intended for interstate commerce. This decision opens the door for the government to regulate land use more broadly.

1960 The United States Congress passes the Landrum-Griffin Act, which regulates labor unions and their activities. This law includes provisions that protect the rights of small farmers and businesses from discrimination by labor unions.

1970 The United States Environmental Protection Agency is created. This agency is responsible for protecting the environment, including regulating land use that could have a negative impact on the environment.

1980 The United States Congress passes the Farm Credit Act, which provides loans and other financial assistance to farmers. This law helps to ensure that small farmers have access to the resources they need to succeed.

1990 The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is adopted. This treaty commits countries to taking steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change. This treaty has implications for land use, as land use changes can affect greenhouse gas emissions.

2000 The United States Supreme Court rules in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council that the government can take private property for public use if the property is not "economically viable" after the government regulation takes effect. This decision makes it more difficult for landowners to challenge government regulations that affect their land.

2010 The United States Congress passes the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which regulates the financial industry. This law includes provisions that protect consumers from predatory lending practices, which could have a negative impact on small farmers and businesses.

2020 The COVID-19 pandemic disrupts the global economy, leading to job losses and business closures. This pandemic has a disproportionate impact on small farmers and businesses, as they are often less able to weather economic shocks.

This is just a brief history of the merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader that the social liberal society. There are many other events that have shaped the way that land is used in social liberal societies, and this list is not exhaustive.

a list of history about merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management, sorted by years:

Year Event

1980s The first wave of land consolidation begins, as public company asset management firms acquire large tracts of land from farmers and other landowners.

1990s The second wave of land consolidation begins, as public company asset management firms acquire even larger tracts of land.

2000s The third wave of land consolidation begins, as public company asset management firms acquire land in anticipation of climate change and other environmental challenges.

2010s The fourth wave of land consolidation begins, as public company asset management firms acquire land for renewable energy projects.

2020s The fifth wave of land consolidation begins, as public company asset management firms acquire land for data centers and other infrastructure projects.

This is just a brief history of the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management. There are many other events that have shaped the way that land is used by public company asset management firms, and this list is not exhaustive.

Here are some of the key drivers of land consolidation by public company asset management firms:

Economic factors: The increasing value of land has made it more attractive for public company asset management firms to acquire land.

Technological factors: Advances in technology have made it easier for public company asset management firms to manage large tracts of land.

Environmental factors: Climate change and other environmental challenges have led public company asset management firms to acquire land for renewable energy projects and other purposes.

Government policy: Government policies, such as tax breaks and subsidies, have made it easier for public company asset management firms to acquire land.

The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management has a number of implications for society. These include:

Increased concentration of land ownership: The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management firms has led to an increase in the concentration of land ownership. This could have a negative impact on the market for land, as it could make it more difficult for small farmers and businesses to access land.

Changes in land use: The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management firms could lead to changes in land use. This could include the conversion of farmland to other uses, such as development or renewable energy projects.

Environmental impacts: The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management firms could have environmental impacts. This could include the loss of biodiversity, the degradation of water resources, and the release of greenhouse gases.

The merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company asset management is a complex issue with a number of implications for society. It is important to carefully consider the potential impacts of this trend before making decisions about land use.

Q&A about merger and acquisition on public company:

Q: What are the benefits of merging or acquiring a public company?

A: There are many benefits to merging or acquiring a public company. Some of the most common benefits include:

Increased market share: By merging or acquiring a public company, you can gain access to their existing customer base and market share. This can help you to grow your business and become more competitive in the marketplace.

New products or services: Merging or acquiring a public company can give you access to new products or services that you can offer to your customers. This can help you to diversify your business and appeal to a wider range of customers.

Reduced costs: By merging or acquiring a public company, you can often reduce your costs by eliminating duplicate functions and overhead. This can help you to improve your bottom line and make your business more profitable.

Increased access to capital: Merging or acquiring a public company can give you access to the public markets, which can make it easier for you to raise capital for future growth.

Q: What are the risks of merging or acquiring a public company?

A: There are also some risks associated with merging or acquiring a public company. Some of the most common risks include:

Integration challenges: Integrating two companies can be a complex and challenging process. This can lead to operational disruptions and employee morale problems.

Financial risks: Merging or acquiring a public company can be expensive. If the acquisition does not go as planned, it could damage your company's financial health.

Regulatory risks: Merging or acquiring a public company can be subject to regulatory scrutiny. This can delay the transaction and increase the costs.

Q: What are the different types of mergers and acquisitions?

A: There are many different types of mergers and acquisitions. Some of the most common types include:

Acquisition: This is when one company buys another company outright. The acquiring company may pay cash, stock, or a combination of both for the target company.

Merger: This is when two companies combine to form a new company. The new company may be a subsidiary of one of the original companies, or it may be a completely new entity.

Reverse merger: This is when a private company merges with a public company in order to go public. The private company becomes the surviving company, and the public company ceases to exist.

Acquisition of assets: This is when one company buys the assets of another company, but not the liabilities. This can be a good way for a company to acquire specific assets or technologies without having to take on the target company's liabilities.

Q: What are the regulatory requirements for mergers and acquisitions?

A: Mergers and acquisitions are subject to a number of regulatory requirements. Some of the most common regulatory requirements include:

SEC filings: Mergers and acquisitions that involve public companies must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This includes filing a Form S-4, which is a registration statement that must be filed with the SEC before an acquisition can be completed.

Antitrust review: Mergers and acquisitions that could substantially lessen competition may be subject to antitrust review by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission.

Shareholder approval: Mergers and acquisitions that involve public companies must be approved by the shareholders of the target company.

Q: What are the legal considerations for mergers and acquisitions?

A: Mergers and acquisitions are complex legal transactions. There are a number of legal considerations that must be taken into account, including:

Contractual agreements: Mergers and acquisitions are typically governed by a number of contractual agreements, including the merger agreement, the purchase agreement, and the employment agreement.

Litigation risks: Mergers and acquisitions can be subject to litigation, including shareholder lawsuits, antitrust lawsuits, and breach of contract lawsuits.

Tax implications: Mergers and acquisitions can have significant tax implications. It is important to consult with a tax advisor to understand the tax implications of a merger or acquisition.

 Q&A about the effect on market, while merger and acquisition the land certificiate of village by a familiy leader on social liberal society:

Q: What are the potential effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader on the market in a social liberal society?

A: The potential effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader on the market in a social liberal society are complex and depend on a number of factors, including the specific terms of the merger or acquisition, the structure of the market, and the regulatory environment. However, some potential effects include:

Increased concentration of land ownership: If the merger or acquisition results in a significant increase in the concentration of land ownership, it could lead to higher prices for land and less competition in the market. This could make it more difficult for small farmers and businesses to access land, which could have a negative impact on the economy.

Disruption of the market: The merger or acquisition could disrupt the market by changing the way that land is bought and sold. This could lead to uncertainty and volatility in the market, which could make it more difficult for businesses to plan for the future.

Changes in land use: The merger or acquisition could lead to changes in land use, as the new owner may have different plans for the land than the previous owners. This could have a significant impact on the community, as it could lead to the loss of farmland, forests, or other important natural resources.

Social and political tensions: The merger or acquisition could also lead to social and political tensions, as it could be seen as a way for a wealthy family to gain control of the village's resources. This could lead to protests and other forms of social unrest.

It is important to note that these are just some of the potential effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader on the market in a social liberal society. The actual effects will depend on a number of factors, and it is impossible to predict with certainty what will happen.

Q: How can the social liberal society mitigate the negative effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader?

A: There are a number of ways that the social liberal society can mitigate the negative effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader. Some of these include:

Ensuring that the merger or acquisition is subject to rigorous regulatory oversight: This will help to ensure that the merger or acquisition does not lead to an increase in market concentration or other negative consequences.

Protecting the rights of small farmers and businesses: The government can provide support to small farmers and businesses, such as loans or grants, to help them access land and compete in the market.

Ensuring that the new owner of the land uses it in a sustainable way: The government can require the new owner of the land to develop a plan for how they will use the land, and to ensure that the land is used in a sustainable way.

Promoting dialogue and understanding between the community and the new owner of the land: This will help to mitigate social and political tensions and ensure that the community's concerns are addressed.

It is important to note that there is no single solution that will mitigate all of the negative effects of a merger or acquisition of land certificates of a village by a family leader. The best approach will vary depending on the specific circumstances. However, by taking steps to ensure that the merger or acquisition is subject to rigorous regulatory oversight, protecting the rights of small farmers and businesses, and promoting dialogue and understanding between the community and the new owner of the land, the social liberal society can help to mitigate the negative effects of this type of transaction.

 a quadrant about supporting efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies:

**Quadrant 1: ** Support with conditions

This quadrant includes people who support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies, but only with certain conditions. These conditions may include ensuring that the land is used in a sustainable way, that the benefits of the merger or acquisition are shared with the local community, or that the merger or acquisition does not lead to displacement.

**Quadrant 2: ** Support without conditions

This quadrant includes people who support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies without any conditions. These people believe that the merger or acquisition will lead to economic growth, improved food security, and sustainable development.

**Quadrant 3: ** Oppose with conditions

This quadrant includes people who oppose efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies, but only with certain conditions. These conditions may include ensuring that the land is not used for speculative purposes, that the benefits of the merger or acquisition are not concentrated in the hands of a few, or that the merger or acquisition does not lead to environmental degradation.

**Quadrant 4: ** Oppose without conditions

This quadrant includes people who oppose efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies without any conditions. These people believe that the merger or acquisition will lead to displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation.

It is important to note that this is just a simplified representation of the different views on this issue. There are many shades of gray between these four quadrants, and people's views may change depending on the specific circumstances.

the steps on how to make a merger and acquisition on public company:

Identify the target company. The first step is to identify the target company that you want to acquire. This can be done by conducting research on potential targets, or by responding to acquisition inquiries from target companies.

Conduct due diligence. Once you have identified a target company, you will need to conduct due diligence to ensure that the acquisition is a good fit for your business. This includes reviewing financial statements, legal documents, and other information about the target company.

Negotiate the terms of the acquisition. Once you have completed due diligence, you will need to negotiate the terms of the acquisition with the target company. This includes the price of the acquisition, the form of payment, and the control of the target company after the acquisition.

File the necessary paperwork with the SEC. Once you have reached an agreement with the target company, you will need to file the necessary paperwork with the SEC. This includes a Form S-4, which is a registration statement that must be filed with the SEC before an acquisition can be completed.

Complete the acquisition. Once the paperwork has been filed with the SEC, you can complete the acquisition. This involves exchanging shares, transferring control of the target company, and other steps.

Here are some additional considerations for a public company that is considering an acquisition:

The public company will need to have the financial resources to complete the acquisition.

The public company will need to be sure that the acquisition is in the best interests of its shareholders.

The public company will need to comply with all of the applicable regulations, including those of the SEC.

An acquisition can be a good way for a public company to grow its business, expand its market share, or enter new markets. However, it is important to carefully consider all of the factors involved before making a decision.

Here are some of the common types of mergers and acquisitions on public companies:

Acquisition: This is when one company buys another company outright. The acquiring company may pay cash, stock, or a combination of both for the target company.

Merger: This is when two companies combine to form a new company. The new company may be a subsidiary of one of the original companies, or it may be a completely new entity.

Reverse merger: This is when a private company merges with a public company in order to go public. The private company becomes the surviving company, and the public company ceases to exist.

Acquisition of assets: This is when one company buys the assets of another company, but not the liabilities. This can be a good way for a company to acquire specific assets or technologies without having to take on the target company's liabilities.

The specific steps involved in a merger or acquisition will vary depending on the type of transaction and the specific companies involved. However, the general steps outlined above are typically involved in any merger or acquisition.

 a formal letter from Donald Trump to the Mayor of Texas about the steps on how to make a merger and acquisition on a public company:

The Honorable Mayor of Texas

City Hall

Austin, TX 78701

Dear Mayor,

I am writing to you today to discuss the steps involved in making a merger and acquisition on a public company. I believe that this is an important topic for businesses in Texas, and I want to make sure that you have the information you need to make informed decisions about your company's future.

There are a few key steps involved in a merger or acquisition. First, you need to identify the target company. This can be done by conducting research on potential targets, or by responding to acquisition inquiries from target companies. Once you have identified a target company, you will need to conduct due diligence to ensure that the acquisition is a good fit for your business. This includes reviewing financial statements, legal documents, and other information about the target company.

After you have completed due diligence, you will need to negotiate the terms of the acquisition with the target company. This includes the price of the acquisition, the form of payment, and the control of the target company after the acquisition. Once you have reached an agreement with the target company, you will need to file the necessary paperwork with the SEC. This includes a Form S-4, which is a registration statement that must be filed with the SEC before an acquisition can be completed.

Finally, you will need to complete the acquisition. This involves exchanging shares, transferring control of the target company, and other steps.

I know that this is a lot of information, but I hope that it is helpful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump

There are a number of negative effects that could result from not supporting efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. Some of these negative effects include:

Loss of economic opportunity: If public companies are not able to acquire land, they may be less likely to invest in the country or region, which could lead to a loss of economic opportunity.

Increased inequality: If land is not being used in a productive way, it could lead to increased inequality, as those who own land will benefit more than those who do not.

Environmental degradation: If land is not being used in a sustainable way, it could lead to environmental degradation, such as deforestation or pollution.

Social unrest: If people are displaced from their land, it could lead to social unrest, such as protests or even violence.

It is important to note that these are just some of the potential negative effects of not supporting efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. The actual effects may vary depending on the specific circumstances.

It is also important to note that there are also a number of potential benefits to supporting these efforts. Some of these benefits include:

Increased economic growth: If public companies are able to acquire land and invest in it, it could lead to increased economic growth.

Improved food security: If land is used in a productive way, it could help to improve food security.

Sustainable development: If land is used in a sustainable way, it could help to promote sustainable development.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies is a complex one. There are both potential benefits and risks to consider. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks before making a decision.

There are a number of ways to support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. Some of these ways include:

Investing in public companies that are involved in land acquisition: This is a direct way to support these companies and their efforts to acquire land.

Voting for politicians who support policies that are favorable to land acquisition by public companies: This is an indirect way to support these companies, as it can help to create an environment that is more conducive to their activities.

Advocating for policies that promote the benefits of land acquisition by public companies: This can include policies that support sustainable land use, economic development, or food security.

Educating others about the potential benefits of land acquisition by public companies: This can help to build support for these companies and their activities.

It is important to note that there are also a number of risks associated with land acquisition by public companies. These risks include the potential for displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of this practice before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

Here are some additional things to consider when deciding whether or not to support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies:

The specific circumstances of each case: It is important to consider the specific circumstances of each case before making a judgment about the motives of the parties involved.

The potential benefits and risks of the practice: It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of the practice before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

Your own personal values and beliefs: Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to support efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies is a personal one. It is important to consider your own personal values and beliefs before making a decision.

There are many countries that have been making efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. Some of these countries include:

China: China has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies in recent years. The country has a large population and a growing economy, which has made it attractive to foreign investors.

ChinaOpens in a new window

id.wikipedia.org

China

India: India is another country that has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies. The country has a large population and a growing economy, which has made it attractive to foreign investors.

IndiaOpens in a new window

www.cnnindonesia.com

India

Brazil: Brazil is a country with a large land area and a growing economy. The country has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies, particularly in the agricultural sector.

BrazilOpens in a new window

id.wikipedia.org

Brazil

Argentina: Argentina is a country with a large land area and a growing economy. The country has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies, particularly in the agricultural sector.

ArgentinaOpens in a new window

siskop2mi.bp2mi.go.id

Argentina

These are just a few examples of countries that have been making efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. It is important to note that there are also many countries that have been critical of this practice, arguing that it can lead to displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of this practice before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

It is also important to note that the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies is not always done with the intention of benefiting and profiting from the land. In some cases, the goal may be to develop the land for sustainable purposes, such as renewable energy or conservation. It is important to consider the specific circumstances of each case before making a judgment about the motives of the parties involved.

There are many cities that have been making efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. Some of these cities include:

London: London is a global financial hub, and it has been a major center for land investment. The city has seen a number of mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies in recent years, and these companies have been able to benefit from the high value of land in London.

LondonOpens in a new window

en.wikipedia.org

London

New York City: New York City is another global financial hub, and it has also seen a number of mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies. These companies have been able to benefit from the high value of land in New York City, and they have also been able to take advantage of the city's strong economy.

New York CityOpens in a new window

en.wikipedia.org

New York City

Singapore: Singapore is a city-state that has been very successful in attracting foreign investment. The city has a number of policies that make it attractive to foreign investors, including a low corporate tax rate and a stable political environment. As a result, Singapore has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies.

SingaporeOpens in a new window

kids.nationalgeographic.com

Singapore

Dubai: Dubai is a city in the United Arab Emirates that has been very successful in attracting foreign investment. The city has a number of policies that make it attractive to foreign investors, including a low corporate tax rate and a stable political environment. As a result, Dubai has been a major destination for mergers and acquisitions of land certificates by public companies.

DubaiOpens in a new window

www.britannica.com

Dubai

These are just a few examples of cities that have been making efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. It is important to note that there are also many cities that have been critical of this practice, arguing that it can lead to displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of this practice before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

Here are some people who have been leading efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies:

Sylvain Groulx is the CEO of Agribusiness Partners, a company that invests in agricultural land. He has argued that land grabbing by public companies can be beneficial for food security and economic development.

Sylvain Groulx, CEO of Agribusiness PartnersOpens in a new window

ca.linkedin.com

Sylvain Groulx, CEO of Agribusiness Partners

Robert Paarlberg is a professor at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He has argued that land grabbing can be used to promote sustainable agriculture and food security.

Robert Paarlberg, professor at the Kennedy School of GovernmentOpens in a new window

salatainstitute.harvard.edu

Robert Paarlberg, professor at the Kennedy School of Government

Peter Hazell is a senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute. He has argued that land grabbing can be used to increase agricultural productivity and reduce poverty.

Peter Hazell, senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research InstituteOpens in a new window

www.amazon.com.be

Peter Hazell, senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute

These are just a few examples of people who have been leading efforts to benefit and profit from the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies. It is important to note that there is no single "best" approach, and the best approach will vary depending on the specific circumstances. However, by taking steps to ensure that the new owner of the land uses it in a sustainable way, and promoting dialogue and understanding between the community and the new owner of the land, these people have been able to make a significant impact.

It is important to note that there are also many people who have been critical of the merger or acquisition of land certificates by public companies, arguing that it can lead to displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of this practice before making a decision about whether or not to support it.

 books about merger or acquisition of land certificates by public company:

The Land Grabbers: The New Frontier in Corporate Colonization by James B. Maass. This book explores the phenomenon of land grabbing, which is the acquisition of land by corporations or governments for profit. Maass discusses the impact of land grabbing on local communities and the environment.

Book The Land Grabbers: The New Frontier in Corporate ColonizationOpens in a new window

www.mdpi.com

Book The Land Grabbers: The New Frontier in Corporate Colonization

The Global Land Rush: The New Scramble for Africa by Michael C. Davis and Daniel C. Nielson. This book examines the recent trend of land acquisitions by foreign investors in Africa. Davis and Nielson discuss the motivations of these investors, the impact of these acquisitions on local communities, and the implications for global food security.

Book The Global Land Rush: The New Scramble for AfricaOpens in a new window

www.economist.com

Book The Global Land Rush: The New Scramble for Africa

Land Grabbing and Global Governance by Ruth Hall, Iain Scoones, Ben White, and David W. Carruthers. This book provides a comprehensive overview of land grabbing, from its history to its current manifestations. Hall et al. discuss the drivers of land grabbing, the impacts on local communities, and the challenges of governing land in the globalized world.

Book Land Grabbing and Global GovernanceOpens in a new window

www.routledge.com

Book Land Grabbing and Global Governance

The New Enclosure: Land Grabs, Food Security, and the Crisis of Global Governance by Eric Holt-Giménez. This book argues that land grabbing is a major threat to food security and global governance. Holt-Giménez discusses the history of land enclosures, the current wave of land grabbing, and the implications for the global food system.

Book The New Enclosure: Land Grabs, Food Security, and the Crisis of Global GovernanceOpens in a new window

www.researchgate.net

Book The New Enclosure: Land Grabs, Food Security, and the Crisis of Global Governance